tokyoprogressive-dot-org
Multimedia section of the social-justice oriented site, TokyoProgressive. Since 1997.

Categories

Alternative media

Archives

2008
July
August

2006
February
April

July 2009
S M T W T F S
     
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 31

Syndication

banner

Colorado "Fusion Center" to Step Up Intelligence Gathering During DNC; US Northern Command to Play Role

Federal and state law enforcement officials in Colorado plan to increase intelligence operations during the Democratic National Convention in Denver and run a fusion center, where intelligence analysts will collect and analyze reports of suspicious activity. Civil rights advocates fear the fusion center could enable unwarranted spying on protesters exercising their First Amendment rights at the convention. [includes rush transcript]

Category: Alternative media -- posted at: 4:51 AM
Comments[0]



banner




July 26, 2008

Kucinich gets his day (watch video)

ANP: Hearing on allegations of Bush administration's misconduct and cause for 'impeachment'


Since June 9, 2008, Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich has pushed for impeachment proceedings against President Bush. Last week, in an effort to placate Kucinich, the House Judiciary Committee finally agreed to hold a hearing July 25, 2008. The night before the hearing, Kucinich sat down with ANP in an exclusive one-on-one interview.

Transcript

KUCINICH: —and for the American people.

REPORTER: Just to clarify, where do you think this should go now? What are you going to urge the chairman to do?
TEXT ON SCREEN: Since June 9, 2008, Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich has pushed for impeachment. Last week, in an effort to placate Kucinich, the House Judiciary Committee finally agreed to hold a hearing July 25, 2008. The night before the hearing, Kucinich sat down with ANP in an exclusive one-on-one interview.

Kucinich Gets His Day
By Davin Hutchins & Ted Roach

INTERVIEWER: Thank you for joining us, Mr. Kucinich, today. Very open question beginning here. Just briefly, if you can, outline your case against President Bush.

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH (D-OH): When a chief executive who is the commander-in-chief commits the lives of young men and women to combat and there are misrepresentations involved, there can't be a graver offense. When you think about this, there should be an outcry for justice because of the human toll that this war has taken. If a president can effectively get away with what this president has done, then it seems there wouldn't be any offense that would be impeachable. Then it would be as if you took the whole concept of impeachment and tore it out of the Constitution, because it would have no meaning there. This is a question of whether or not our Constitution has an enduring value with respect to the coequality of Congress, a Congress and its constitutionally mandated function of a check and balance on administrative abuse of power. I'm going to put the Constitution on the table and say, what do we stand for? Is this all politics? Is everything reduced to some base exchange between political contestants and the ends justify the means? We have seen in the last few weeks an escalation of the rhetoric with respect to Iran. We've also seen that the Congress is planning on adjourning in mid-September. If Congress were to adjourn in mid-September, that essentially opens up a window between mid-September and the inauguration for this president to be able to once again strike at a country with impunity. And that's why this is so urgent, that we begin this process of examining what this president is doing and has done. You know, speakers made it very clear: tomorrow is not a hearing on the impeachment resolution. I've made it equally clear that I'm going to be presenting a case in the five minutes I'm allowed that suggests that the Congress should begin to look at these disparities between what we were told to take us into war and what the facts were.

INTERVIEWER: You're allotted five minutes?

KUCINICH: Right. I'm just hopeful that the committee will listen and that the leadership will reconsider based on hearing from the American people. This isn't about me. I mean, I'm a messenger. I'm willing to take a stand. I just happen to be one member of Congress.

Friday, July 25, 2008

REP. JOHN CONYERS (D-MI), CHAIRMAN, HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: [inaudible] committee will come to order. Let's proceed with [inaudible] concerns about the excesses and the exercises of the executive branch authority as has been produced in this present administration.

REP. ROBERT WEXLER (D-FL): Never before in the history of this nation has an administration so successfully diminished the constitutional powers of the legislative branch. It is unacceptable, and it must not stand.

REP. JERROLD NADLER (D-NY): I had the misfortune to be here during the investigation and impeachment of President Clinton, who at worst lied about an affair. It had to be one of the most demeaning and prurient circuses to which I have ever been subjected. In this case, we are involved with far more serious allegations.

REP. LAMAR SMITH (R-TX): Nothing is going to come out of this hearing with regard to impeachment of the president. I know it, the media knows it, and the speaker knows it.

REP. MIKE PENCE (R-IN): And let me direct my attention to my colleague on the left, today and in every respect, Mr. Kucinich from Ohio. I think the gentleman knows of my respect and affection for him. I appreciate his passion and his focus, and I do not begrudge him his efforts in pursuing this cause. I just believe the gentleman from Ohio is dead wrong on our history and on the facts and on the Constitution.

KUCINICH: Our country has been at war in Iraq and has occupied the streets and villages of Iraq for five years, four months, and six days. The primary justifications for going to war outlined in the legislation which the White House sent to Congress in October 2002 have been determined conclusively to be untrue. Many members of Congress relied on these representations from the White House to inform their decision to support the legislation that authorized the use of force against Iraq. The decision before us is whether to honor our oath as members of Congress to support and defend the Constitution that has been trampled time and again over the last seven years. The decision before us is whether Congress will stand up to tell future presidents that America has seen the last of these injustices, not the first. I believe the choice is clear. I ask this committee to think and then to act now in order to enable this Congress to right a very great wrong and to hold accountable those who misled this nation. I thank you.

~~~

KUCINICH: I think that we have to get to the truth. Now, whether that would lead to the removal of the president's a whole, altogether different question. Our first responsibility is to find the truth. The American people have a right to know whether or not their government took them into a war based on a lie, especially when we've had over 4,000 troops dead, we've had over a million innocent Iraqis die, we've had over $3 trillion and the projected costs of this war. We must find out the truth, and then wherever the truth leads in a democracy can only be good for the democracy. Thank you very much.

TEXT ON SCREEN: Despite the collection of tens of thousands of signatures supporting impeachment of Bush, House Democrats have no plans to schedule formal impeachment hearings.

Camera
Davin Hutchins
Danielle Ivory
Ted Roach

Editor
Ted Roach

Associate Producer
Danielle Ivory

DISCLAIMER:

Please note that TRNN transcripts are typed from a recording of the program; The Real News Network cannot guarantee their complete accuracy.


Category: Alternative media -- posted at: 4:32 AM
Comments[0]

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Defends Her Opposition to Impeachment: “If Somebody Had a Crime that the President Had Committed, That Would Be a Different Story.”

On Monday, Rep. Pelosi appeared on ABC’s The View and suggested impeachment is off the table because there is no evidence President Bush has committed any criminal acts. We ask Rep. Dennis Kucinich for a response. Kucinich recently introduced a single article of impeachment against President Bush. The article accuses Bush of deceiving Congress to authorize the invasion of Iraq. [includes rush transcript]



JUAN GONZALEZ: We’re talking about the use of public subsidies for sports stadiums. We’re joined from Washington, D.C. by Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich. And here in New York, we have Bettina Damiani, the project director of Good Jobs New York, and Neil deMause, author of Field of Schemes: How the Great Stadium Swindle Turns Public Money into Private Profit.

But, Congressman Kucinich, you’ve been leading the fight for impeachment, and I know you have to go very soon, so I wanted to ask you about an interview with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that aired on The View earlier this week. She was asked about impeachment.

    JOY BEHAR: You’ve ruled against impeaching George Bush and Dick Cheney, and now Kucinich is trying to pass that. Why do you insist on not impeaching these people, so that the world and America can really see the crimes that they’ve committed?

    REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, I think that it—I think it was important, when I became Speaker—and it’s, by the way, a very important position—President, Vice President, Speaker of the House—I saw it as my responsibility to try to bring a much divided country together to the extent that we could. I thought that impeachment would be divisive for the country.

    In terms of what we wanted—set out to do, we wanted to raise the minimum wage, give the biggest increase in veterans benefits to veterans in the seventy-seven-year history, then pass research for stem cell research, all of that. This week, we’re going to pass equal pay for equal work. It has been a long time in coming—pay equity. We’re going to pass legislations for product safety, for toys that children put in their—there’s an agenda that you have to get done. You have to try to do it in a bipartisan way. The President has to sign it.

    If somebody had a crime that the President had committed, that would be a different story.

    JOY BEHAR: Can they still do it after he’s out?

    BARBARA WALTERS: When we—when I interviewed you last year, you had just begun, and you were going to clean up the mess, remember?

    REP. NANCY PELOSI: And we did.

    BARBARA WALTERS: You look around this country, 75 percent of the country—forget George Bush—thinks that Congress is doing a lousy job.

    ELISABETH HASSELBECK: I think it’s 91 percent now.

    REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, I don’t disagree with that, because largely it’s predicated on ending the war in Iraq. That’s the main question, and we were not successful. In our House of Representatives, I’m very proud of our members, because they voted overwhelmingly over and over again to bring the war to an end, bring the troops home safely and soon, sent it to the Senate, and it hits a dead end.

    But in terms of that particular standard, I would say I disapprove, as well. But we do—we passed some of the things I just mentioned, the energy bill. We worked in a bipartisan way, Innovation Agenda. We have to create jobs, expand healthcare, protect the American people and educate our children. And you can’t do that if you’re trying to impeach the President at the same time, unless you have the goods that this president committed crimes.


JUAN GONZALEZ: That was House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Congressman Kucinich, your response to her take on the situation with impeachment?

REP. DENNIS KUCINICH: Well, now that I’ve heard that the Speaker is looking for evidence that crimes may have been committed, I certainly want to direct her attention to the thirty-five articles of impeachment that I presented, which assert quite directly that crimes have been committed, including taking this nation into a war, an illegal war, based on lies; including the deaths of over a million innocent Iraqis, which constitute a war crime; including wiretapping, rendition, torture, illegal detention. There are many examples of laws that have been broken.

And the reason why the Judiciary Committee should hold a hearing on the impeachment itself is because there needs to be a public airing of this. So, I have a great deal of respect for Speaker Pelosi, and I think that since she made that statement on The View, there’s an opportunity now for us to come forward and to lay all the facts out so that she can reconsider her decision not to permit the Judiciary Committee to proceed with a full impeachment hearing.

I just want to state this, that I appreciate that she consented to a hearing on Friday. It was a six-hour hearing, over a dozen witnesses. Twenty-four members of Congress attended. It’s being taken seriously.

I think the idea that nothing can be done right now because we’re on the eve of an election raises questions about our constitutional responsibility to be a check and balance to administration abuse of power. If in fact we’re in a war that’s based on lies, and we have thousands of troops whose lives are on the line every day, we owe it to them and we owe it to the American people to set straight the public record. And then, whether or not it results in the President being removed from office before the end of his term is another matter.

I want to further say that with the possibility of a war in Iran in the offing, a war against Iran, a war that would be a result of a pre-emptive attack, much like the one that the United States launched against Iraq, it becomes very important that we hold this administration to the highest standard of having to verify the statements they make to take us into one war and to try to take us into another.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, thank you, once again, for joining us.




Help

Printer-friendly version

Purchase DVD/CD

LISTEN
WATCH



Category: Alternative media -- posted at: 5:08 AM
Comments[0]

  • フードスタンプ受給者が、かつてなく増加
  • マイケル・ポーラン アメリカ人の危険な食生活
  • ハイチの食糧暴動をもたらした米国の政策
  • 飽食と飢餓 世界食糧システムの隠れた戦い
  • 「帝国の基地は要らない」米軍の海外基地に反対する国境を越えた運動
  • レバノン 米国が支援する政府側武装勢力とヒズボラが衝突
  • ヒューマニティの前線から エグランド元国連緊急援助調整官が語る
  • コンゴ紛争 第2次大戦後最悪の内戦から巨利を得る外国企業
  • 「冬の兵士」集会:イラク・アフガニスタンの帰還兵が戦争の残虐さを証言
  • ロレッタ・ナポレオーニが語る「ならず者経済 資本主義の新たな現実」
  • 「3兆ドルの戦争」スティグリッツとビルムズがイラク侵攻と駐留経費の真実を語る
  • ニューヨーク初のアラビア語公立学校にバッシング
  • カーター・センターに集う世界の女性人権活動家
  • 女性の権利とエジプトの民主化を求め続けるナワル・エル・サーダウィ
  • 「アパルトヘイトではなく平和を」ジミー・カーター、パレスチナを語る
  • 「水色の約束」 モード・バーロウと水の正義を求めるグローバルな運動
  • ポール・クルーグマンの「リベラルの良心」
  • メディア系列化容認に動くFCC
  • FCCが公共電波の大量競売へ
  • 「20世紀のメディア王」ルパート・マードック
  • 政治を変える一票? 大統領候補の影に残虐行為の首謀者たちが
  • チャベス大統領の改憲案 国民投票で否決
  • チャベス政権、民放テレビ局を閉鎖 是非をめぐり徹底討論
  • チャベスと希望の枢軸 タリク・アリの新著『カリブの海賊』
  • インドネシア独裁を支援した米民主党
  • 東ティモールの虐殺
  • インドネシアの元独裁者スハルトが死去
  • ダイヤモンド商レバイエブの副業は パレスチナ占領地の入植地と壁の建設
  • チョコレートのほろ苦い経済 児童労働廃止はかけ声倒れ
  • 「イエスは何を買うだろう?」 ビリー牧師と無買聖歌隊の「買い物やめろ」伝道
  • 「闇」へ 「対テロ戦争」の下の米国の虐待
  • グアンタナモ米軍基地 テロ容疑者収容開始から6周年
  • ボトルウォーターのウソ 水の民営化への抗議はテロ
  • バンダナ・シバ 第三世界への環境汚染アウトソーシングを批判
  • 貧国と富裕国のあいだに広がる温暖化の格差
  • 『マルコムX 自伝』を問い直す マニング・マラブルの新たなマルコム像
  • ブッシュ家の崩壊  親子の確執につけ入り、過激信仰集団が権力の中枢を握って侵略戦争を開始
  • メディアは地球温暖化をどう伝えているか?
  • ジョージ・シュルツ元米国務長官 VS 環境活動家ポール・エーリック:地球温暖化、世界の紛争、中国、アル・ゴア、環境をめぐって
  • 「アフガニスタンで最も勇気ある女性」マラライ・ジョヤ
  • ブルックリンからバクダッドに架かる平和の橋
  • イラク戦争4周年(2007年)の反戦大集会
  • イスラエルは聖書の教えとアパルトヘイトの教訓に学べ デズモンド・ツツ
  • アナポリスから中東平和は生まれない 頼みは民衆の連帯のみ ノーム・チョムスキー
  • グアテマラ大統領選でアルバロ・コロンが当選 虐殺に関与した陸軍大将を破っての勝利に 先住民らも喜びの声
  • アルゼンチンに初の女性大統領が当選 IMFとネオリベラル政策への明確な拒否
  • ボリビア大統領エボ・モラレスに聞く 少数民族の権利、気候変動、イラク情勢、イランとの国交樹立、チェ・ゲバラの功績
  • ボリビア改憲案に反対し 裕福な東部4県が自治宣言
  • ベトナム代表団 いまも続く枯れ葉剤「エージェント・オレンジ」の被害で米化学企業を提訴へ
  • ハイチの苦難の歴史 黒人奴隷革命から大統領拉致まで
  • エクアドルの先住民と米大手石油企業のシェブロンとの戦い (22分)
  • 石油大手シェブロンはビルマ軍事政権との関係解消を
  • だれがベナジル・ブットを殺した? 混迷深まるパキスタン
  • イスラエル、イラン、米国の隠れた関係
  • イラク石油法は「強盗行為」 石油労働者組合の創始者が語る
  • 「味方がないのに真実を訴えるのは、学者として途方もない勇気がいる」 ホロコースト産業を批判するフィンケルスタイン教授に圧力
  • チョムスキー「ダーショウィッツはフィンケルスタインの 終身在職権阻止の“聖戦”を開始した」
  • 革命家チェ・ゲバラ 没後40年の遺産
  • 「アイスランドに倣えば石油戦争も温暖化もなくなる」オノ・ヨーコ
  • 「彼らの武器で戦っても必ず彼らが勝つ」平和運動家ジョン・レノン
  • 「自分が言わなければ誰が言う?」バティスト退役陸軍少将
  • チョムスキーとジン異例の共同インタビュー ベトナムからイラクへ
  • ジョン・ピルジャー「リベラルな報道機関による民主主義の圧殺」
  • シンディ・シーハン 大統領弾劾を要求
  • 哀しみに暮れる母から反戦運動リーダーへ
  • 「ショックドクトリン」 ナオミ・クライン新著を語る
  • 帰還兵が語るイラク市民への攻撃
  • 「わたしに請求してくるスパイ」 諜報活動の民営化
  • 「イラクはもはや存在しない」 米軍のイラク侵略がもたらした民族浄化、難民危機、中東の政情不安
  • ヒップホップと政治、差別用語と差別発言  マイケル・エリック・ダイソン教授が語る
  • バナナのチキータ社が コロンビアのテロ組織への資金提供を認める
  • パレスチナ人俳優モハメド・バクリ ジェニン侵攻の記録映画の制作で被告席へ
  • グレッグ・パラストが語るハゲタカ・ファンドを終わらせるための戦い
  • スターバックスがエチオピア・コーヒーの商標登録に合意
  • 「ペンタゴン・ペーパーズ」(ベトナム機密文書)を世に出した3人が語る、驚くべき実話(2) -マイク・グラベル、ロバート・ウェスト
  • 「ペンタゴン・ペーパーズ」(ベトナム機密文書)を世に出した3人が語る、驚くべき実話(1) -ダニエル・エルズバーグ
  • 「地球温暖化に取り組まないのは、何億もの貧しい人々に死刑を宣告するようなもの」
  • チャルマーズ・ジョンソン:復讐の女神ネメシス-アメリカ共和国の終焉
  • エコノミック・ヒットマンが語るアメリカ帝国の秘史  ―経済刺客、暗殺者、グローバルな腐敗の真相
  • 安価な抗エイズ薬の製造は是か非か? アボット社VSタイ政府
  • マイケル・ムーア『シッコ Sicko』 続編 911救援隊員を連れてキューバのグアンタナモへ
  • 『シッコ Sicko』公開間近!マイケル・ムーアがカリフォルニア州議会に語る
  • ハマスの内幕 イスラエルが育てた戦闘的イスラム主義運動
  • アフリカ未開発油田の国際争奪
  • グレッグ・パラスト 連邦検事解任疑惑の裏には、巨大な投票妨害工作が
  • 「気づいていないから問題になっていない」 子ども向けメディアにおけるジェンダー格差
  • 『アメリカのファシスト』急進的キリスト教右派の政治的野望
  • 『2つのハバナを生きた男』 キューバ革命闘士マックス・レズニックの波乱万丈な人生
  • ブラッド・ウィル(1970-2006)に捧ぐ(2) インディメディア、スクウォッター、オアハカ、デヴィッド・ロヴィックス
  • シントンがピンクに染まる:平和活動集団「コードピンク」参上!
  • モハメド・アリ 政治にコミットするスポーツ選手の草分け
  • ムミア・アブ=ジャマールの再審なるか? 山場を迎える元ブラックパンサーの冤罪事件
  • 難民救助運動の今と昔  80年代の中米独裁政権擁護者が現ブッシュ政権の中枢に
  • 「ノーモア・デス」国境をわたる難民に、保護を与えるのは重罪か
  • 戦争税なんて払いたくない 連邦税の40%が軍事費に?
  • 『明日の思い出』 オルタナティブ思想家マイケル・アルバート
  • ダルフール 虐殺を終わらせるために
  • 消えた石油はどこへ? ハリバートン社のドバイ移転を考える
  • 『誰が電気自動車を殺した?』 GMのEV-1の不可思議な消失
  • エリツィンの遺産、ハルバースタムの遺産
  • 軍病院に反戦歌はいらない ジョーン・バエズが傷痍兵のために歌うのを軍が拒絶
  • ジェレミー・スケイヒル 国防総省の民間委託をめぐる下院公聴会で証言
  • 「情勢が悪化すればするほど、戦争は美味しいビジネスになる」ナオミ・クライン、戦争の民営化について
  • ブラックウォーター 世界最強の傭兵軍の勃興
  • 「移民のいない日」アメリカ史上最大級のデモ 150万人が移民の権利を主張

Category: Alternative media -- posted at: 1:14 AM
Comments[0]

Obama sells Europeans on Afghan war
European public hails Obama as the anti-Bush, but politicians cool to idea of more troops in Afghanistan

The Guardian headline said “Obama gets rock star welcome” One Berliner called it “an Anti-Bush rally”, and the Financial Times Deutshland called it an “ad for the war on terror “. In a speech laden with cold war rhetoric, Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama stood before more than 200,000 people in Berlin on thursday and summoned Europeans and Americans to work together on many issues, from Iraq and Afghanistan to the “War on Terror” and climate change. Andreas Zumach of Die Tageszietung: European politicians are somewhat glad about the general statements Obama made on the need for improving the Euro-Atlantic alliance again. They have read about what he said on more cooperation on global issues like climate change, on the US in the future more obeying international law. They are very wary, especially the ones in Germany, France, and the other big European countries, about the clear message he sent on Afghanistan, where he very clearly and undiplomatically said, "We need more of your troops in Afghanistan," which means more war fighting done by the Europeans in a war that's bound to be lost.

More critiques of liberal infatuation with vagues promises of change:

Change we can believe in?

Pepe Escobar: Obama's foreign policy team is Clinton's team  June 28, 2008



Category: Alternative media -- posted at: 3:26 AM
Comments[0]